• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Compare And Contrast Essays On Music

This essay is a ‘compare and contrast’ of the rhythm and structure of the following three musical works:

Be sure to check out the other A2 musical pieces and AS musical pieces I have analysed on Ask Will Online.

The use of structure in The Joke helps to bring about a comical atmosphere to the piece. Haydn uses the rondo form which consists of ABACA. The ending of the piece ends with the ‘Joke’ theme (first appeared at bars 1-2) which is repeated with general pauses in between making the audience not know if the piece has finished or not. For Haydn to use rondo form, this means the main ‘Joke’ theme will be reheard three times at the bare minimum. Therefore, by the time the piece has finished, the ‘Joke’ theme will be associated as comical for the amount of times it has been heard. This makes the ending in particularly comical.

Comparing this to Brahms’s Piano Quintet, he uses the ternary form of ABA to help progress the themes. Unlike Haydn, Brahms wants the two sections to be completely contrasting with section A being fast and lively and section B, starting at bar 194, to be the complete opposite being soft, delicate and slow. However, even though the two sections juxtapose, section B has some elements of the third main theme creating a slight link between sections. This makes clear the progression Brahms want – the piece is moving in a direction. Therefore, unlike Haydn who was trying to create a comical atmosphere, Brahms wants to progress the themes from the use of a ternary structure.

Miles Davis’s Four does not have any clear structure because it is blues: the majority of times, Miles Davis is improvising with his saxophone with a steady beat created from the drums and the piano which is comping. However, the score suggests there is a hint of a structure being the ‘Heat, ‘1st chorus’ and ‘2nd chorus’. However, to the untrained ear, the sections will not contrast like Brahms does or have any impact on the atmosphere of the music. The only reason for the structure in Four is to make clear, a bit easily, what is going on in this blues piece.

The rhythm in The Joke is based around the main theme of the piece which is heard first in Violin I at bar 1 onwards. The main ‘Joke’ theme has a dominant use of quavers making it extremely light-hearted and bouncy to hear. This is because there is the use of staccato on the quavers. However, the piece can be seen to be quaver-based (e.g. bara 128-132). Therefore, from first hearing quavers used in a way to produce a light-hearted mood, the listener will associate the rest of the quavers as the same. This puts of a mood over the whole piece of beng happy and bouncy which links into being comical.

On the other hand, Brahms’s Piano Quintet is solely dependent on the rhythms created. Each melody features a different rhythm. For example, the first melody at bars 1-12 has the use of syncopation between parts through imitating each other. Whereas, the second main theme or the ‘galloping’ theme at bars 13-21 has the use of semiquavers to quicken the tempo contrast the two melodies. This can then be supported by section B which has a smooth and calm melody (bar 194) from increasing the note values. However, there are some themes too which are ‘hybrids’ of other themes. For example, at bars 35-41, both the galloping and first theme can be heard through using quavers with a syncopated rise of metrical displacement.

In Miles Davis’s Four, the rhythm is much more random due to the improvisation of blues music. However, the piece starts of with a melody of quavers with Miles Davis plays on his sax. Therefore, in the ‘Head’ section, the rhythm is relatively straightforward. Once we get to the two choruses, the improvisation starts to happening creating huge amounts of syncopation such as at bars 2.25-3.9. The piano is the instrument which enables syncopation to happen from having a non-melodic line which is staccato and syncopated to the drum’s beat.

Ultimately, the structure and rhythm of the above pieces vary to create a different mood, atmosphere or progression in each respected piece. Brahms wants to create a structure which progresses the scattering of themes he has in the piece whereas Miles Davis’s Four has no direction: the structure and free rhythm makes it seem like the piece will go or, more like, can go in any direction the musicians want it to go. On the other hand, The Joke uses a strict structure and rhythm to entice the listener into the main theme which is centered around being comic.

Related

Launch Teen Ink Chat

close

Chat with other
Teen Ink members

Teen Ink's chat is available to Teen Ink members only. If you're aged 13-19, please sign up or log in.
bRealTime banner ad on the left side

Site Feedback

Music of the Past vs Today's Music

February 16, 2011

It’s obvious that when turning on popular radio stations today, you’ll most likely hear one thing and one thing only- mainstream music. In a way, I can understand how it’s likeable. Most of it has a great beat, catchy lyrics, and the type of music is what we grew up with in our generation. Not all house music is terrible music, don’t get me wrong. But some artists of today have forgotten the main components that make a truly talented artist. Step outside the mainstream box for a second, and take a look at how much has really changed in music over the years. Sometimes, not for the better.

Go back in time a few decades, to the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Lots of the bands from these eras have become internationally famous, and their music has become classic. Artists like The Rolling Stones, The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Aerosmith, Nirvana, and so many other successful bands. All of these bands became famous, because they had something that’s hard to find today- real talent. Many of the bands of the past wrote music that had real depth to it. Their lyrics were meaningful, they wrote their own music, they played multiple instruments, they didn’t use auto tune or synthesizers, and many other factors. Using something like auto tune was considered an insult back in the day. Today it’s almost on impulse, and everyone is using it so it’s not much of an indignity anymore. It’s more of the new regular, which makes it obvious that some mainstream artists of today lack the real talent of the music of the past.

Many of the lyrics have no real depth to them anymore either. Lots of mainstream artists don’t even write their own. The music is repetitive, and the lyrics sometimes involve swearing and the same typical situations, like “going to a club tonight”, “let’s get this party started”, or the typical thought that every song has to be about love, falling in love, being in love, or something having to do with love. It would be great for some artists to try and expand their music into more than just one topic of “love”, and try writing a song about a different issue or situation in life. This music is great for hearing at a party, or something upbeat to hear. But when you actually want to listen to the music, I’m not sure this is exactly what everyone is looking for.

To finish this, I’ll start by saying that not all music of today is bad. There are lots of underground bands of today – and even some mainstream- that still have the actual depth and talent in their music, to become even greater someday. It disappoints me though, when underground bands with real musical talent are getting less attention than a popular artist that constantly uses a synthesizer or has someone write their songs for them. It is an opinionated topic, but I still think it’s something for everyone to debate, whatever genre or era you’re a fan of.





One thought on “Compare And Contrast Essays On Music

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *